My Facebook friend D. and I are not looking.
We are fighting because the State Labor Court Cologne allowed employers to require workers to wear underwear, and the color too. D. suspects, employers should arrange the wearing of bras, for example, so that the uniforms worn not so fast. On to conclude, bare breasts would hurt the textile.
I believe, however, that bare breasts fogged glasses and frowned upon, because they are most welcome. But I'm not sure if the workers now what about the Underwear may attract. If they are allowed that, the color of the underwear would be damn.
D. Does the other hand, if they could not wear pants or skirts, they would also not wear underwear, so as not to wear the pants and skirts. The
lights to me. - No! The lights
me not! The employer wants to take his men's underwear. That would be nonsense if they WOULD what about it, then one would see nothing of it. In my opinion, the underwear bid trousers or skirt ban. My girlfriend thinks partout
but that workers who are naked, hiding nothing, and nothing wear. They interpreted when I understand it correctly, the sentence to the effect that especially good workers naked workers.
We are just not lawyers. We find the badly complicated. She is unsure she wants to do anything wrong and is trying out naked to work.
I do not know. What should I do? I come in flesh-colored or bright?
0 comments:
Post a Comment